I've recently come across advice that editing a piece should require completely retyping it. Supposedly, merely rereading a story and editing in the process allows the writer to pass over various errors. Only typing out every word a second time allows the proper amount of attention to be given to every aspect of the work.
I'm not sure about that myself.
Of course, the time difference is unappealing, but it shouldn't be a problem if it really helps the writer catch all of the details, right? I just doubt that it does everything it's supposed to. I've been using this method for Tributes and Tribulations, and it does do some good, don't get me wrong. I've made several changes in word choice, and I've caught a few other errors.
One big advantage it gives me is that, since I'm retyping previous
paragraphs before I write the next ones, it gets me into a rhythm.
Staring at a blank page is one thing, but if I've already typed several
paragraphs—even if you haven't actually "done" anything in the process—it feels like I've already started.
The thing is, this really just works for line-editing... and it's not too good at that. It takes so much mroe time that the writer is given a more limited view of the piece each session, so some plot details or long-ago-mention character qualities have more opportunities to slip through. Furthermore, retyping doubles the odds of making typographical errors. I've caught some in the first draft, but I've also made several new ones during retyping.
Maybe those less prone to typing mistakes will find this method more effective. It is, of course, only one round of editing, and I personally would advise to use it last, for the line-edits.
Have you tried rewriting a work, word for word? How well has it worked for you?
Hm, I've never personally tried this. I have to agree, it does seem a little unnecessary and time-consuming. Your chapters are fairly short, but still, if I were you, I personally wouldn't want to retype everything just to catch a few spelling errors.
ReplyDeleteYeah, it really does seem excessive.
Delete