And here is your allotment of odd and interesting vocabulary.
aplomb cachinnate shinplaster
gallimaufry kickshaw spume
bricolage toxophilite zowie
diffident antipathy saturnine
comestible chivy sclaff
tortuous celerity balkanize
chicane crazy-quilt operose
rathskeller pell-mell aphelion
esurient comestible quiff
sotto voce pandurate nidificate
voluble clinquant cynosure
Follow the quest of a relatively young author trying to write something decent and publish it.
Translate
Showing posts with label words. Show all posts
Showing posts with label words. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 1, 2014
Sunday, May 4, 2014
Words, Words, Words
More interesting-sounding words that I may or may not ever get to use.
(This may be the last instalment, as I've gone through all of the dictionary.com Words of the Day I had saved.)
gonzo perstreperous pervicacious
verboten timorous hirsute
glabrous cadge collimate
oneiric lodestar cock-a-hoop
truckle aphesis pettifogging
riposte ugsome galligaskins
slake dulcify blatherskite
schatzi chirk moiety
toothsome razz columbine
sciamachy cockalorum geomancy
inkhorn bonnyclabber anagnorisis
(This may be the last instalment, as I've gone through all of the dictionary.com Words of the Day I had saved.)
gonzo perstreperous pervicacious
verboten timorous hirsute
glabrous cadge collimate
oneiric lodestar cock-a-hoop
truckle aphesis pettifogging
riposte ugsome galligaskins
slake dulcify blatherskite
schatzi chirk moiety
toothsome razz columbine
sciamachy cockalorum geomancy
inkhorn bonnyclabber anagnorisis
Tuesday, April 22, 2014
Do You Really, Truly, Actually Need That Adverb?
Along my quest of editing The Long and Winding Road into its eventual end product, I've butted heads with many adverbs. Some say to never use them, but they're part of our language for a reason, right? At the same time, I do see them weakening verbs and adjectives from time to time. So, if it's all right to keep them sometimes, and it's all right to nix them sometimes, when do I do what?
I decided to make a sort of flowchart for my own theory on proper adverb use, as a reference during editing.
What do you think? Decent adverb theory? What's your stance on the dreaded modifiers?
I decided to make a sort of flowchart for my own theory on proper adverb use, as a reference during editing.
What do you think? Decent adverb theory? What's your stance on the dreaded modifiers?
Sunday, March 23, 2014
A Few More Words
More cool words here.
crepitate senescense picayune
zeitgeber cheeseparing cerebrate
prognosticate billingsgate jingoism
fantod kelpie crepuscule
phantasmagoric skeigh clepe
novitiate commix tenuity
wroth geit wight
slumgullion hardihood lipogram
umbriferous whitherward klaxon
cathexis oeillade sozzled
skosh welkin comport
wamble hornswoggle echt
litigious bosky perspicuous
crepitate senescense picayune
zeitgeber cheeseparing cerebrate
prognosticate billingsgate jingoism
fantod kelpie crepuscule
phantasmagoric skeigh clepe
novitiate commix tenuity
wroth geit wight
slumgullion hardihood lipogram
umbriferous whitherward klaxon
cathexis oeillade sozzled
skosh welkin comport
wamble hornswoggle echt
litigious bosky perspicuous
Tuesday, February 18, 2014
This Month's Vocabulary
A continuation of my interesting word posts.
pratfall rutilant logy
malversation effulgence snood
scrum blighter yawp
edacity fribble scabrous
poetaster bushwa clangor
quillet dreck waif
finagle gibbous doggerel
auspicate serotinal habiliment
peplum anfractuous dissilient
orrery fleer pilose
albedo gangle loblolly
bluestocking picaro tittup
snollygoster trepan blowzy
pratfall rutilant logy
malversation effulgence snood
scrum blighter yawp
edacity fribble scabrous
poetaster bushwa clangor
quillet dreck waif
finagle gibbous doggerel
auspicate serotinal habiliment
peplum anfractuous dissilient
orrery fleer pilose
albedo gangle loblolly
bluestocking picaro tittup
snollygoster trepan blowzy
Wednesday, January 22, 2014
Yet Another Compilation of Interesting Words
These posts may not be the most interesting to read (or, too consuming of dictionary-page-flipping time to fully enjoy), but, well, there's still more to the series, and I might as well keep it going.
rectitudinous quittance pollywog
elytron xeric droll
gormless haberdashery spang
phosphene shilly-shally whangdoodle
inveigh preterition melliferous
invective daven quacksalver
nimiety swivet allochthonous
glom gaumless darg
eupeptic impawn pasquinade
imbricate splenetic mordacious
pococurante percipient wuther
abecedarian chuffed lunker
wangle verisimilitude wonk
obnubilate hellion codger
rectitudinous quittance pollywog
elytron xeric droll
gormless haberdashery spang
phosphene shilly-shally whangdoodle
inveigh preterition melliferous
invective daven quacksalver
nimiety swivet allochthonous
glom gaumless darg
eupeptic impawn pasquinade
imbricate splenetic mordacious
pococurante percipient wuther
abecedarian chuffed lunker
wangle verisimilitude wonk
obnubilate hellion codger
Saturday, January 4, 2014
He Said, She Said
Speech tags are quite the troublesome creatures. Some people say not to use them at all; some say to only use "say"; some say to use whatever as long as you don't add adverbs.
I'm still a little conflicted on this point myself. I would do a study of books I read to see what techniques they use, but... I've never actually noticed. I don't know whether that means it's the right way of doing it or it just doesn't matter to me as a reader, though.
Although I do admit I have somewhat of a stance. I don't remember what story it was, but some time ago I decided to never use the word "said." Not by replacing speech tags with more sideways attributes, but by using "growled," "muttered," and so on. That did not go well. I agree with the idea that these sorts of tags should be used sparingly, and only if the tone of the speaker isn't obvious in the words themselves. Sometimes I have to debate between using such speech tags or using italics, exclamation points, etc. in the quote. I'm still not sure how to resolve those.
I don't like the idea of never using speech tags, though. I do try to avoid them sometimes, when I'd rather break up some dialogue ("I don't know." He leaned back, his head thumping against the wall. "I've just about had it, myself."), but I don't think this needs to be a golden rule. It's nice to have "beats" like that, as I've heard them called, but sometimes it leads to noting every time someone rearranges his legs or something, and it's just a lot of words without meaning. I'd rather throw a few "say"s in there than put out such boring beats all of the time.
How about you? Do you take much notice of speech tags in your reading or writing?
I'm still a little conflicted on this point myself. I would do a study of books I read to see what techniques they use, but... I've never actually noticed. I don't know whether that means it's the right way of doing it or it just doesn't matter to me as a reader, though.
Although I do admit I have somewhat of a stance. I don't remember what story it was, but some time ago I decided to never use the word "said." Not by replacing speech tags with more sideways attributes, but by using "growled," "muttered," and so on. That did not go well. I agree with the idea that these sorts of tags should be used sparingly, and only if the tone of the speaker isn't obvious in the words themselves. Sometimes I have to debate between using such speech tags or using italics, exclamation points, etc. in the quote. I'm still not sure how to resolve those.
I don't like the idea of never using speech tags, though. I do try to avoid them sometimes, when I'd rather break up some dialogue ("I don't know." He leaned back, his head thumping against the wall. "I've just about had it, myself."), but I don't think this needs to be a golden rule. It's nice to have "beats" like that, as I've heard them called, but sometimes it leads to noting every time someone rearranges his legs or something, and it's just a lot of words without meaning. I'd rather throw a few "say"s in there than put out such boring beats all of the time.
How about you? Do you take much notice of speech tags in your reading or writing?
Thursday, December 26, 2013
Just Look Here
It comes to my attention during revision that I overuse quite a few words. Ignoring articles and conjunctions, which shouldn't be an issue if I don't keep repeating the same sentence structure, the worst offenders are "just" and "look."
"Just" is tricky—it sort of adds a vague limit to the sentence, and it's hard to get rid of without getting an uncomfortable twinge. The best trick seems to be unanimously deleting them in editing without paying attention to the context and then adding it back in if I notice it missing. "Quite" and "a bit" are in the same boat.
"Look" gets overused because it's more vague than some other verbs. If I try to plug in synonyms, it doesn't always work for me. It doesn't help that I use it as a verb and a noun all of the time.
This isn't exactly a comprehensive list. It's hard to figure out how much each kind of word should be used. The "glue" that's necessary for correct usage of the English language in general can't be skipped, but exactly how "invisible" is each word? "Said" can be used often and is indeed recommended more than its relatives, but is it the only non-copula verb of its type? How invisible is "look"? "Just"? Others?
"Just" is tricky—it sort of adds a vague limit to the sentence, and it's hard to get rid of without getting an uncomfortable twinge. The best trick seems to be unanimously deleting them in editing without paying attention to the context and then adding it back in if I notice it missing. "Quite" and "a bit" are in the same boat.
"Look" gets overused because it's more vague than some other verbs. If I try to plug in synonyms, it doesn't always work for me. It doesn't help that I use it as a verb and a noun all of the time.
This isn't exactly a comprehensive list. It's hard to figure out how much each kind of word should be used. The "glue" that's necessary for correct usage of the English language in general can't be skipped, but exactly how "invisible" is each word? "Said" can be used often and is indeed recommended more than its relatives, but is it the only non-copula verb of its type? How invisible is "look"? "Just"? Others?
Monday, December 23, 2013
More Words To Use and Love
Since the first post didn't quite cover all of my pretty words, I've decided to make a second. The list still isn't comprehensive, but here's more of it.
pelagic versicolor exordium
simper fulgurant violescent
velleity assoil couthie
fabulist parturient hypnopompic
vigorish splendiferous kibitzer
ramose quid brabble
rollick troth intemerate
spleenful balsamaceous word-hoard
celadon erinaceous plotz
Tartuffery mulligrubs wellaway
sententious cruciverbalist jackanapes
austral adiaphorous atavistic
tardigrade apopemptic irrefrangible
draggle fastigiate lollapalooza
pelagic versicolor exordium
simper fulgurant violescent
velleity assoil couthie
fabulist parturient hypnopompic
vigorish splendiferous kibitzer
ramose quid brabble
rollick troth intemerate
spleenful balsamaceous word-hoard
celadon erinaceous plotz
Tartuffery mulligrubs wellaway
sententious cruciverbalist jackanapes
austral adiaphorous atavistic
tardigrade apopemptic irrefrangible
draggle fastigiate lollapalooza
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Words to Use and Love
While my main love is for the stories and sometimes the characters, I have to appreciate the words themselves. Here are a few of my favourites (usually just because of the sound of them), although I haven't always had the chance to squeeze them in naturally.
I was going to provide the definitions in this post, but that might be a little long. As it is, I'm only posting a small portion of my saved words.
spangled brown study apoplectic
etiolated fomite larrup
bespatter torrefy divulse
boffin catawampus ravelment
wowser erubescent cunctation
skylark mantic agnate
asseverate hoary chockablock
impecunious aureate abstergent
nidus melismatic mumpsimus
foofaraw overslaugh sumpsimus
lucubration nervure aliquant
coffle skirr hypethral
malapert bosh deflagrate
incondite hew orectic
So, what are your thoughts? Have any words of your own that have never quite fit in a scene, or are a little too rare for the common reader (and often spellcheck)?
I was going to provide the definitions in this post, but that might be a little long. As it is, I'm only posting a small portion of my saved words.
spangled brown study apoplectic
etiolated fomite larrup
bespatter torrefy divulse
boffin catawampus ravelment
wowser erubescent cunctation
skylark mantic agnate
asseverate hoary chockablock
impecunious aureate abstergent
nidus melismatic mumpsimus
foofaraw overslaugh sumpsimus
lucubration nervure aliquant
coffle skirr hypethral
malapert bosh deflagrate
incondite hew orectic
So, what are your thoughts? Have any words of your own that have never quite fit in a scene, or are a little too rare for the common reader (and often spellcheck)?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
